Seedance 2.0 Pricing and Credits Explained
Understand how Seedance 2.0 credits work, what usually increases cost, and how to budget experiments across plans and top-ups.
This page is not a replacement for the live pricing page. The pricing page remains the source for current checkout details.
This guide exists for a different reason: to help teams understand how credits behave in practice so they can budget experiments instead of guessing.
How to think about credits
Credits are the operating budget of the generation workflow.
In practical terms, credits are affected by the kind of request you make, such as:
- the generation mode
- the selected model tier
- duration
- resolution
- whether you are running a light exploration pass or a higher-cost premium pass
The exact cost is shown in the generator before you submit a job. That is the number to trust for the final decision.
What the current plan structure looks like
The current public structure in this project includes:
| Plan | Monthly credits |
|---|---|
| Mini | 500 |
| Standard | 1000 |
| Plus | 2500 |
The site also supports credit top-ups, currently structured as:
- 100 credits
- 200 credits
- 500 credits
- 1000 credits
There is also a small Google sign-up bonus in the current configuration, and yearly billing includes an extra credit bonus in the project settings.
Because pricing and packages can change, use this page for planning logic and the live pricing page for exact checkout terms.
What usually makes a generation cost more
The main drivers are straightforward:
- longer clips cost more than shorter clips
- higher resolution costs more than lower resolution
- premium model selections cost more than baseline passes
- some advanced, consistency-oriented workflows can cost more than simple exploration
This means the cheapest workflow is usually:
- short duration
- one clear shot
- baseline model choice
- minimal re-rolls
The expensive workflow is usually not "one good shot." It is repeated failed attempts on unclear prompts.
The budgeting mistake teams make most often
Teams usually overspend in one of two ways:
- they start with premium settings before the shot logic is stable
- they burn retries because the prompt is vague
A better sequence is:
- validate the idea with the cheapest stable setup
- lock the composition and motion
- only then move up to more expensive settings if the shot deserves it
That approach is better for both credits and output quality.
A practical way to budget by use case
Exploration budget
Use this when you are still deciding:
- the concept
- the camera move
- the tone
- the prompt structure
Best practice:
- keep shots short
- avoid premium modes too early
- test one variable at a time
Production budget
Use this when you already know:
- which mode is correct
- which subject or product must stay stable
- which shot will actually ship
This is when spending more credits makes sense, because the request is already constrained enough to justify it.
How to choose between a plan and a top-up
Monthly plans make more sense when:
- you generate every week
- you are running creative testing continuously
- you need predictable monthly capacity
Top-ups make more sense when:
- demand is irregular
- you already have a plan but need temporary burst capacity
- a campaign needs short-term extra volume
If you are repeatedly buying top-ups every month, that is usually a signal the base plan is too small.
Credits expiration and refunds
In the current project configuration:
- many plan or package credits are set to expire after 30 days
- failed generations caused by system errors are intended to be refunded
- paid credit packages are generally non-refundable once added
See the live refund policy and checkout terms for the final operational policy.
What makes a plan feel "too small"
A plan is usually too small when:
- your team cannot run first-pass exploration without rationing
- you keep skipping iteration because credits feel scarce
- you rely on top-ups to finish routine monthly work
At that point, the problem is not just spend. It is creative bottleneck.
The healthiest credit habit
The best credit discipline is not "never spend." It is:
- spend cheaply while learning
- spend more only after the shot is defined
- avoid paying premium costs for vague prompts
That is why the most SEO-relevant and operationally relevant advice is the same: clearer inputs waste fewer credits.
Related pages
Seedance 2.0 for Cinematic Shots
A cinematic workflow for Seedance 2.0, covering shot planning, camera language, scene discipline, and how to build sequences from stable clips.
Seedance 2.0 Commercial Use Guide
A practical commercial-use guide for Seedance 2.0 covering plan rights, source-asset risk, real-person references, and team review checks.
DeepSeek V4 Video ドキュメント